WORLD JOURNAL OF ADVANCE
HEALTHCARE RESEARCH

( An ISO 9001:2015 Certified International Journal )

An International Peer Review Journal for Medical Science and Pharma Professionals

An Official Publication of Society for Advance Healthcare Research (Reg. No. : 01/01/01/31674/16)

World Journal of Advance Healthcare Research (WJAHR) has indexed with various reputed international bodies like : Google Scholar , Index Copernicus , SOCOLAR, China , Research Bible, Fuchu, Tokyo. JAPAN , Cosmos Impact Factor , Scientific Indexing Services (SIS) , UDLedge Science Citation Index , International Impact Factor Services , International Society for Research Activity (ISRA) Journal Impact Factor (JIF) , Scientific Journal Impact Factor (SJIF) , IFSIJ Measure of Journal Quality , International Scientific Indexing, UAE (ISI) (Under Process) , International Impact Factor Services (IIFS) , Web of Science Group (Under Process) , Directory of Research Journals Indexing , Scholar Article Journal Index (SAJI) , International Scientific Indexing ( ISI ) , Academia , Scope Database , Research Publication Rating and Indexing , Doi-Digital Online Identifier , ISSN National Centre , Zenodo Indexing , International CODEN Service, USA , 

ISSN 2457-0400

Impact Factor  :  7.675

WJAHR Citation

  All Since 2020
 Citation  105  60
 h-index  4  4
 i10-index  3  2

News & Updation

  • Article Invited for Publication

    Dear Researcher, Article Invited for Publication  in WJAHR coming Issue.

  • WJAHR: New Impact Factor

    WJAHR Impact Factor has been Increased from  5.464 to 7.675 for Year 2026.

  • WJAHR: JUNE ISSUE PUBLISHED

    JUNE 2026 Issue has been successfully launched on JUNE 2026.

  • New Issue Published

    Its Our pleasure to inform you that, WJAHR June 2026 Issue has been Published, Kindly check it on https://www.wjahr.com/home/current_issues

Best Article Awards

World Journal of Advance Healthcare Research (WJAHR) is giving Best Article Award in every Issue for Best Article and Issue Certificate of Appreciation to the Authors to promote research activity of scholar.

Best Article of current issue

Download Article : Click here

Indexing

Abstract

EARLY VERSUS DELAYED CHOLECYSTECTOMY FOR ACUTE CALCULOUS CHOLECYSTITIS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SURGICAL OUTCOMES AND POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS AT AL SALAM TEACHING HOSPITAL, MOSUL

*Dr. Qusay Ahmed Njati Younus

ABSTRACT

Background: Acute cholecystitis is one of the most common surgical emergencies and laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains the definitive treatment. However, the optimal timing of surgery continues to be debated, with ongoing discussion regarding the benefits and risks of early versus delayed cholecystectomy. Objectives: To compare the surgical outcomes and postoperative complications of early versus delayed cholecystectomy in patients with acute calculous cholecystitis treated at Al Salam Teaching Hospital, Mosul. Methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted at Al Salam Teaching Hospital, Mosul, Iraq, between July 2024 and May 2026. A total of 200 patients diagnosed with acute calculous cholecystitis were included and divided into two groups according to the timing of surgery: early cholecystectomy (n=100) and delayed cholecystectomy (n=100). Demographic characteristics, operative outcomes, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, readmission rates, and overall surgical outcomes were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 27, and a P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The mean age of the patients was 46.0 ± 12.9 years, and females represented 60.5% of the study population, with a female-to-male ratio of 1.53:1. The mean operative time was significantly shorter in the early cholecystectomy group compared with the delayed group (68.4 ± 18.7 vs. 79.6 ± 22.3 minutes; P = 0.001). Overall postoperative complications occurred in 10.0% of patients undergoing early surgery and 20.0% of those undergoing delayed surgery (P = 0.046). The mean hospital stay was significantly shorter in the early group (3.1 ± 1.2 days) than in the delayed group (5.6 ± 2.1 days) (P < 0.001). Readmission rates were also significantly lower among patients undergoing early cholecystectomy (3.0% vs. 15.0%; P = 0.003). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified delayed surgery (OR = 2.89, P = 0.014) and diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.11, P = 0.047) as independent predictors of unfavorable postoperative outcomes. Conclusions: Early cholecystectomy was associated with shorter operative time, reduced hospital stay, lower readmission rates, fewer postoperative complications, and better overall surgical outcomes compared with delayed cholecystectomy. Delayed surgery and diabetes mellitus were significant predictors of unfavorable postoperative outcomes. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy should therefore be considered the preferred treatment strategy for suitable patients with acute calculous cholecystitis.

[Full Text Article] [Download Certificate]