WORLD JOURNAL OF ADVANCE
HEALTHCARE RESEARCH

( An ISO 9001:2015 Certified International Journal )

An International Peer Review Journal for Medical Science and Pharma Professionals

An Official Publication of Society for Advance Healthcare Research (Reg. No. : 01/01/01/31674/16)

World Journal of Advance Healthcare Research (WJAHR) has indexed with various reputed international bodies like : Google Scholar , Index Copernicus , SOCOLAR, China , Research Bible, Fuchu, Tokyo. JAPAN , Cosmos Impact Factor , Scientific Indexing Services (SIS) , UDLedge Science Citation Index , International Impact Factor Services , International Society for Research Activity (ISRA) Journal Impact Factor (JIF) , Scientific Journal Impact Factor (SJIF) , IFSIJ Measure of Journal Quality , International Scientific Indexing, UAE (ISI) (Under Process) , International Impact Factor Services (IIFS) , Web of Science Group (Under Process) , Directory of Research Journals Indexing , Scholar Article Journal Index (SAJI) , International Scientific Indexing ( ISI ) , Academia , Scope Database , Research Publication Rating and Indexing , Doi-Digital Online Identifier , ISSN National Centre , Zenodo Indexing , International CODEN Service, USA , 

ISSN 2457-0400

Impact Factor  :  7.675

WJAHR Citation

  All Since 2020
 Citation  105  60
 h-index  4  4
 i10-index  3  2

News & Updation

  • Article Invited for Publication

    Dear Researcher, Article Invited for Publication  in WJAHR coming Issue.

  • WJAHR: FEBRUARY ISSUE PUBLISHED

    FEBRUARY 2026 Issue has been successfully launched on FEBRUARY 2026.

  • New Issue Published

    Its Our pleasure to inform you that, WJAHR February 2026 Issue has been Published, Kindly check it on https://www.wjahr.com/home/current_issues

  • WJAHR: New Impact Factor

    WJAHR Impact Factor has been Increased from  5.464 to 7.675 for Year 2026.

Best Article Awards

World Journal of Advance Healthcare Research (WJAHR) is giving Best Article Award in every Issue for Best Article and Issue Certificate of Appreciation to the Authors to promote research activity of scholar.

Best Article of current issue

Download Article : Click here

Indexing

Abstract

VALIDITY OF THE PREOPERATIVE ANTHROPOMETRIC PARAMETERS FOR PROPER CHOOSING OF LENGTH AND DIAMETER OF THE TIBIAL NAIL IN COMPARISON WITH ACTUAL PARAMETERS TAKEN BY RADIOLOGICAL METHOD

*Khalid Jamal Mubdir, Prof. Dr. Midhat M. Mahdi

ABSTRACT

Background: Tibial shaft fractures are common high-energy injuries that require precise implant selection to ensure stability, promote healing, and minimize complications. While intramedullary nailing is the gold standard of the management, accurate preoperative estimation of nail length and diameter remains challenging, often relying on intraoperative trial-and-error. Aim of the study: This study evaluated the accuracy of simple anthropometric and radiological measurements in predicting appropriate Tibial nail dimensions. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from June 2024 to June 2025 in Basrah hospitals, Iraq, including 60 adult male patients with unilateral tibial shaft fractures. Preoperative measurements of the intact contralateral limb—Tibial tuberosity to joint line of the ankle-(TT-JL)—Tibial condyle-medial malleolus (TC-MM)—Tibial tuberosity-medial malleolus (TT-MM) and measurement of tibial canal diameter at the isthmus, were recorded and correlated with intraoperative measurements determined nail length and diameter. Statistical comparisons employed paired t-tests for length and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for diameter, with accuracy assessed at ±10 mm and ±5 mm (length) and ±0.5 mm (diameter). Results: The tibial tuberosity–to–joint line (TT-JL) method yielded the smallest mean difference from intraoperative nail length (3.13 mm, p = 0.004) and the highest accuracy within ±10 mm (85%), outperforming Tibial Tuberosity-Medial malleolus (TT-MM) (80%) and Tibial Condyle-Medial malleolus (TC-MM) (76.67%) methods. Accuracy within ±5 mm was highest for Tibial Tuberosity-Medial malleolus (TT-MM) (68.33%), followed by Tibial Tuberosity to joint line of ankle (TT-JL) (66.67%) and Tibial Condyle-medial malleolus (TC-MM) (51.67%). Preoperative diameter estimates consistently underestimated intraoperative values (mean difference −1.29 mm, p < 0.001), with low precision (±0.5 mm accuracy: 16.67%). Mean operative time was 88.48 minutes, with a mean of 42.82 fluoroscopic exposures. Conclusion: Anthropometric measurements, particularly the TT-JL distance, can reliably estimate tibial nail length preoperatively, potentially reducing operative time and intraoperative adjustments. However, plain radiographic assessment of nail diameter remains unreliable, indicating the need for refined imaging protocols or advanced measurement tools. Standardizing preoperative length estimation methods could enhance surgical efficiency and safety in tibial shaft fracture management.

[Full Text Article] [Download Certificate]