WORLD JOURNAL OF ADVANCE
HEALTHCARE RESEARCH

( An ISO 9001:2015 Certified International Journal )

An International Peer Review Journal for Medical Science and Pharma Professionals

An Official Publication of Society for Advance Healthcare Research (Reg. No. : 01/01/01/31674/16)

World Journal of Advance Healthcare Research (WJAHR) has indexed with various reputed international bodies like : Google Scholar , Index Copernicus , SOCOLAR, China , Research Bible, Fuchu, Tokyo. JAPAN , Cosmos Impact Factor , Scientific Indexing Services (SIS) , UDLedge Science Citation Index , International Impact Factor Services , International Society for Research Activity (ISRA) Journal Impact Factor (JIF) , IFSIJ Measure of Journal Quality , Scientific Journal Impact Factor (SJIF) , International Scientific Indexing, UAE (ISI) (Under Process) , International Impact Factor Services (IIFS) , Web of Science Group (Under Process) , Directory of Research Journals Indexing , Scholar Article Journal Index (SAJI) , International Scientific Indexing ( ISI ) , Academia , Scope Database , Research Publication Rating and Indexing , 

ISSN 2457-0400

Impact Factor  :  6.711

WJAHR Citation

  All Since 2020
 Citation  105  60
 h-index  4  4
 i10-index  3  2

News & Updation

  • Article Invited for Publication

    Dear Researcher, Article Invited for Publication  in WJAHR coming Issue.

  • Journal web site support Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Opera, Saffari for easy download of article without any trouble.

    .

  • 6th International Conference on Human and Soci

    Venue:FCT Education Resource Center, Abuja- Nigeria                                        September 22-24, 2019

  • .

    6th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY AND CURRICULUM STUDIES(ICETC2019) 

     

    Venue: FCT Education Resource Center, Abuja-Nigeria

    September 22-24, 2019

  • WJAHR: New Impact Factor

    WJAHR Impact Factor has been Increased to 6.711 for Year 2024.

  • WJAHR: JUNE ISSUE PUBLISHED

    JUNE 2025 Issue has been successfully launched on JUNE 2025.

  • New Issue Published

    Its Our pleasure to inform you that, WJAHR June 2025 Issue has been Published, Kindly check it on https://www.wjahr.com/home/current_issues

Best Article Awards

World Journal of Advance Healthcare Research (WJAHR) is giving Best Article Award in every Issue for Best Article and Issue Certificate of Appreciation to the Authors to promote research activity of scholar.

Best Article of current issue

Download Article : Click here

Indexing

Abstract

PAIN CONTROL AFTER CESAREAN SECTION: TRANSVERSE ABDOMINIS PLANE BLOCK VERSUS INTRAVENOUS PATIENT CONTROLLED ANALGESIA WITH FENTANYL

Dr. Dhiaa Mohammad Jabbar*, Dr. Ali Nima Hassan and Dr. Murtadha Salim Kadhim

ABSTRACT

Background: Around the world, cesarean sections (CS) are among the most common surgical procedures. Pain after a cesarean section is expected. A primary source of pain following a cesarean section is the incision formed in the abdominal wall. Parenteral self-administering drugs (PCA) and regional afferent nerve block (TAP block) are two effective modes that have recently gained popularity to control this pain. Aim of the study: to assess the impact of two different methods for postoperative analgesia (TAP) block and patient control analgesia (PCA) with IV fentanyl after an elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia on a patient’s pain efficacy and safety. Methods: This randomized controlled research was comprised of sixty women having a cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. They were split into two equal groups: the IV fentanyl PCA group and the TAP block group. After the surgery, while the patient was in the recovery room, the TAP block group received a total of 20 ml diluted 0.25% bupivacaine for each side (we mixed 10 ml of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine with 10 ml of normal saline). The IV fentanyl PCA group receives an initial dose of 1 mcg/kg and then boluses of 20 mcg at a lock-time of 8 minutes. Postoperatively, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, nausea and vomiting, sedation, and visual analogue score were noted over 24 hours (at 0h, 1h, 2h, 4h, 6h, 12h, and 24h). ANOVA and the Chi-square test were used for statistical analysis. Result: Patients who received TAP block had prolonged analgesia; the mean time for rescue analgesia was 12±5 hours, and 6.5±2 hours for both the TAP block group and IV fentanyl PCA group respectively. The pain score was also lower in the TAP block group compared to the IV fentanyl PCA group. Nausea & vomiting scores and sedation scores were lower in the TAP group compared to the IV fentanyl PCA group. Conclusion: An ultrasound-guided TAP block is a more important and safe approach to provide postoperative analgesia to cesarean section under spinal anesthesia than IV PCA with fentanyl.

[Full Text Article] [Download Certificate]